The Blender incident

A couple of days ago there was a heated discussion over at Pam’s House Blend about Virginia Fox, and Hate crimes laws and free speech.
my first post,

hate crimes is now every crime (0.57 / 7)
see what hate crime laws have started. We have open Pandora's box, now everything will be a hate crime.. 

---

by: sickntired @ Tue Apr 28, 2009 at 15:04:01 PM EDT

Ok, in that post I post I fail to fully explain my point.  It would now seen that what ever one said to someone can be construed as hate speech and in some cases a hate crime.

The following follower really had a problem with my statement, “Saywhat?”, “Qscribe”. “Bachalon”, to say the least the discuss turn in braw, and Pam stop it. Which was her right, I have know for year that my mouth gets me in to hot water more then once. However during this discuss, one thing was proven that we are very quick to start the name calling, from I’m a “Republican” to “idiot” to a “mental case”, and my favorite “Moron”.

You're a gay republican aren't you? Because your need to defend the straight people is mighty telling of your own self-hatred.

Sorry to say I’m not a Republican, and no I don’t hate my self, However I do hate the fact that we (lgbt community) need to play the fucking victim card, over and over and over, it old hat and very tired.

we need to get the laws apply equally but claiming that we need this to protect ourselves is just stupid,
I would rather have equally protection under that laws (for crimes committed against me) then this other crap we have been fighting for.
i would rather have acceptance instead of marriage.
Which by the way won't and isn't a cure for all our problems. 

---

by: sickntired @ Tue Apr 28, 2009 at 15:50:02 PM EDT

The thought behind this post is that we should have lobby and fought to have current laws applied equally and fairly, instead of insisting on the creation of new laws to help protect us, which by the way hate crime law doesn’t really, it only add time to a sentence after the person is convicted of the crime.

Its funny.. (3.00 / 1)
Cause I'd rather have the marriage than the acceptance. Because people have a right to their stupidity and I respect their American right to that. Now 'acceptance' in the form of housing protection, employment, and the like to the basic essentials? That's what i want.
But you don't have to like faggots. Because this one prolly doesn't like you either... lol.

---

by: saywhat? @ Tue Apr 28, 2009 at 16:12:08 PM EDT

Many of the LGBT community thinks that if we get the right to marry that its going to solve all our problems, which it won’t.

We need to face the fact that we are truly pushing our lifestyle on others, Well, actually the Lesbians are, one might ask what do I mean by this, well lets take E-harmony and a photographer in New Mexico, for not servicing our needs. This is forcing the issue, no matter how we would like to hide it, this is forcing our choice on others. We sue when we can’t get our way, and force other to accept us.

Then Blender Bachalon said this

The fact remains that we ARE victims; perhaps not as much as some would have people think, but while DADT, DOMA, and other GLBT specific laws remain, we are victims.

Nice, we are victims as long as DADT, DOMA, and other GLBT specific laws remain, just what other laws are you talking about???

Face it we need to stop playing the fucking victim card and just live our lives. It seen to me that the only one really who wants marriage is the Lesbians since it seen that they are the first to the office and to the church.

Ok I’m may not always be articulate.

Well one of my points about our community have been proven to night. That we are just the same bitch people as are our counterparts.

I might have been wrong, but I’m entitle to my opinions about the LGBT community.

We have used the VICTIM card so much that it is now a broken fucking record.

here a nice little quote for a fellow faggot,

The fact remains that we ARE victims; perhaps not as much as some would have people think, but while DADT, DOMA, and other GLBT specific laws remain, we are victims.

And it should come as no surprise that victims of policy easily become victims of violence.

these issue isn’t new, they just didn’t pop up out of the fucking blue.

DADT, was a complete failure, We have know since the very beginning of the Military that we were not welcome, the marriage issue has been around for a few thousand years, no new there, and GLBT specific laws make up more of victims.

What we need to do is to get our lawmakers and local DA to apply those law that are already on the book equally. in most case our sexuality should not be apart of it at all. But us being self center victims we have to make it about our sexuality.

Hate speech, hate crimes, what is your take?

hate speech is any thing that is said that upset another person.

WOW then this means if I don’t like what you say then I can classified it as hate speech, run off to the local magistrate and charge you with a hate crime..

So I guess I can’t call lawyer a bunch of blood sucking leeches, and politicians as a bunch of crooks.

Could this also explain why the KKK doesn’t hold public rallies anymore.

The one people that seems willing to show off their hate in public is the Phelps Family.. (which is a bunch of lawyers at that).

Same-Sex Marriage

Question of the Day

Why is it in every state where we are allow to marry and in CA where we were once allow to marriage, why does the national press, and local LGBT news and bloggers show pictures of the Lesbians who are marrying.

I can only guess because even in the screw LGBT community women are more important then the men, why else did GLBT got change to LGBT..

WE talk about Equality, when we don’t even have Equality in our own sorry ass community. There is more sexism in our community then in the straight community.
Its all about the Dykes,

while gay men are the perverts of the community..

CNN: CNN Newsroom - Schools Block Gay Web Sites

Glaad need a get a fucking life..

CNN interviews high school students from Knoxville, Tenn., on their school's blocking of access to LGBT Web sites and the ACLU's subsequent intervention.

First off its the school's computers he was using and they have the right to block what they want. He could have done this search at home on his computer,, ACLU they pick and chose which cases they will take.

what a bunch of shit..

WOW, Lets all act surprise by this shall we!!

This is From our Blog Diva Pam’s house blend,

Aubrey Sarvis, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's executive director, calls on the president to live up to his campaign promise to end discrimination in the military in this open letter, "Stand by Your Word Mr. President: End 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'":

President Obama is a brave man. He doesn't hesitate to take great political risks. He asked Congress for billions to save the banking system and more billions to stimulate the economy - and Congress handed them to him. Not everyone looked happily on the trillions we'll be facing in debt, but in a Washington Post-ABC News poll released Sunday he still got a 69 percent approval rating - the highest of any president at the 100-day mark in 20 years - and 72 percent of Americans said they have a favorable impression of him. Not since Ronald Reagan's first 100 days has a president done so well. Obama is not only living up to most Americans' expectations, he's exceeding them.

So here we have a decisive president who's not afraid to act boldly on the economy. He takes the enormous risk of allowing the release of the torture memos, and even so more Americans approve of that controversial act than disapprove. Majorities say that that the country has turned around and is now headed in the right direction, and that he's kept his campaign promises.

That's a lot of political capital, and political capital is political power. The president may never have a better moment. There is, however, one campaign promise he's been silent on since he was elected in November: the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." It's still up there on the White House website.

Honestly, the president and this White House has been silent about all of his promises related to equality since he took office. The White House has shown an aversion to even commenting on equality occurring around the country after it flubbed its response to the Iowa decision. And even worse on the DADT front, all the signals so far have been "delay because we cannot multitask." The funding for DADT continues, the discharges continue.

Lets face it, Obama never intended to lift the ban on gays in the military. This was just one of his campaign lies, to get his sorry ass in office, just like Clinton did, Clinton Signed DADT into law just as he did with DOMA, just like Clinton he claim to what equality for all, but we know that it isn’t want his bosses want him to do.. Please the President is nothing more then a puppet on a string

Please Obama will not follow thru on many of his campaign lies..

here is the proof that he isn’t really in control,

"President Obama agrees with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili and other military experts that we need to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy," it says. "The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve. Discrimination should be prohibited. The U.S. government has spent millions of dollars replacing troops kicked out of the military because of their sexual orientation. Additionally, more than 300 language experts have been fired under this policy, including more than 50 who are fluent in Arabic. The President will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure it helps accomplish our national defense goals."

He agrees but does nothing at all, because he is to busy bailing out big Corp America, and those who gave big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to his campaign. All awhile screwing over those who really need help.

My thoughts

from Joe my God site,

Same-sex marriage became legal this morning in Iowa and judges waived the three-day waiting period for some couples who wanted to marry immediately. Under the headline Historic Day For Iowa, the Des Moines Register is covering the scene at county recorders' offices all over the state. Anti-gay activists delivered petitions at some state offices demanding that recorders "obey their conscience" and refuse to issue licenses to same-sex couples, but so far there is no report of any state employee refusing to do so.

Just who are these special fags and dykes who got this privileged to get marry on the same day after getting their licenses. What did they have to do? Who’s pole got lick and who’s carpet got munched?

Question of the day

If you are gay and trash your community, does that may you are HomoPhobe?????????????

WE NEED TO LEAVE MS CALIFORNIA THAT HELL ALONE..

Kate Clinton on Ms CA

Love tgeh comment about the dress, Please Ms K. Clinton, you know damn well you would hit that if you could and if she would have your tired old p*ssy..

R.I.P. Perez Hilton! (Featuring Hilton himself)

I love this youtube video..

Just love it..

Its right to the point...

should it be same-sex or dykes firsts marriage

it seem to me that only the dykes wants to get marry, so bad that they are the first in almost every state that has allow us to marry..

 

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Same-sex couples began applying for marriage licenses at government offices across Iowa on Monday, and at least one lesbian couple tied the knot in a ceremony in Des Moines.

Melisa Keeton and Shelley Wolfe were declared "legally married" by pastor Pat Esperanaza during a ceremony in front of Polk County administrative offices in Des Moines. It didn't take long before they were referring to one another as "wife."

"It's not very romantic is it?" Melisa Keeton joked about the location and media attention at the ceremony.

They will share the last name Keeton.

The couple believes they were the first same-sex couple married in Polk County, and possibly the state, since an April 3 Iowa Supreme Court ruling that legalized gay marriage.

"I didn't think it would be us," said Shelley Keeton, whose twin brother was served as one of the witnesses to the ceremony.

Hate speech vs. Free speech

Hate crimes (also known as bias-motivated crimes) happen when an influential mind targets a victim because of their membership in a certain social group, usually defined by racial group, religion, disability, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation.
 
A "hate crime" can take two forms: "hate crime" generally refers to criminal acts which are seen to have been motivated by hatred of one or more of the listed conditions. The second kind is hate speech, which is speech defined as crime. While hate crimes are rarely debated, the hate speech concept is controversial, as criminalizing speech can be seen as impugning freedom of speech. Incidents may involve physical assault, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse or insults, or offensive graffiti or letters.

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that hate crime statutes which criminalize bias-motivated speech or symbolic speech conflict with free speech rights because they isolated certain words based on their content or viewpoint .

Some have argued hate crime laws bring the law into disrepute and further divide society, as groups apply to have their critics silenced.

Some have argued that if it is true that all violent crimes are the result of the perpetrator's contempt for the victim, then all crimes are hate crimes. Thus, if there is no alternate rationale for prosecuting some people more harshly for the same crime based on who the victim is, then different defendants are treated unequally under the law, which violates the United States Constitution.
And now for the cop-out by the nine asshole justices at the Supreme Court 

..(thanks for nothing)

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that penalty-enhancement hate crime statutes do not conflict with free speech rights because they do not punish an individual for exercising freedom of expression; rather, they allow courts to consider motive when sentencing a criminal for conduct which is not protected by the First Amendment.

So the added five years isn’t a penalty, MMMM

I think its time to set limits on the term of these nine lazy ass judges at the Supreme…. No more term for life.., they should be voted on by the people..

New Order - True Faith
Fame - Irene Cara
Out here on my own - Irene Cara (Fame)
I Sing The Body Electric - Fame

testing new blog writer

this is only a test, please this is only a test

Welcome to my day

 

What do you see

 

Perez is fucking it up

Perez "media whore" Hilton, who wishes he was Paris Hilton is fucking up the marriage issue for all of us.



I can only guess this airhead wasn't getting enough air time of what ever channel was stupid enough to put hiim on air, now he is making the round for gay marriage. Please I know damn well there are better candidates out that to speak on our behalf.

Perez Hilton who claim to be a gay Latin American who is so proud of himself, can't and won't used his real name.

This idiot is making us out as a bunch of petty jilted fags..

More samples of new camera setting

 

 

 

 

Trying out other setting on my camera

What do you think of these shots?

 

 

 

 

Perez Readers rack Perez over the coals

#
NickyToronto says – reply to this
Just because she didn't give your opinion you think shes a stupid bitch. That's stupid Perez.
#
justbecuz says – reply to this
She was right and you are wrong. Enough said.
#
Molly :) says – reply to this
Oh grow up Perez. Every single person is entitled to their own opinions. Atleast she was honest and said it in a way that was not meaning to be offensive. You see things so one sided. I fucking hate your site anymore.
#
Plinkie9 says – reply to this
Comments? Yeah, you are a douche. Get over it Perez. You sicken me.
#
itellitlikeitis says – reply to this
i think this has been blown out of proportion! discriminating against her bc she doesn't support gay marriage is the same as ppl discriminating gays…. its things like this that prove that there will always be some sort of discrimination no matter what.
#
l-dub says – reply to this

Perez, get over it! The US is a democracy, people are entitled to their own opinions regarding gay marriage. People are entitled to freedom of religion, and if she believes that her religion does not permit gay marriage, she's entitled to her beliefs! You are acting like a spoiled brat. She says she is tolerant about gays making their own choices, why is it that YOU think that she has to be an activist for gay marriage if it's not something she personally believes in! Her answer was in no way hateful, but YOU are full of hate.

I love the comment from Itellitlikeitis, she is so right..

Perez couldn't make it by acting, so he started a blog making fun of those who wouldn't give him the time of day, and now he thinks he has arrive,and is their BFF

l-dub says said it best Perez hates himself so much that he takes it out on other who doesn't agree with his sorry faggot ass..

Those who Followthis Media Whore need a

Perez Media Whore Hilton need to get a fucking life, he try Miss America into a fucking joke, then goes on Larry King to bast in his stupidest ..
btw

No self respecting gay male would wearpink boots with that outfit, hell many wouldn't wear the outfit either

Media Whore Perez update his Wikipedia page ASAP

Miss USA 2009

Hilton served as a judge for the Miss USA 2009 pageant in Las Vegas, Nevada on April 19, 2009. During the Q&A portion of the contest, Hilton's question came to the Miss California representative, Carrie Prejean. Hilton asked:

“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”

Prejean responded:

“Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you.”

Hilton called the answer “the worst answer in pageant history”. Later on his blog, he remarked "She lost not because she doesn’t believe in gay marriage, she lost because she’s a dumb bitch!"^[49]

^ "Perez Hilton lays into Miss USA beauty contestant over gay marriage answer". News.com.au. 2009-04-20. http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25359158-5013560,00.html. Retrieved on 2007-04-20.

Perez need to take his sorry ass back to the scum bucket he come out of,

I ofter wonder why he doesn't use his real name,, which is Mario Armando Lavandeira, Jr.

Perez is nothing more than a Media Whore

How nice that Perez Media Whore Hilton, can call MS CA a bitch, when he really wanted to call her a cunt, and he feels its his right, However if she called him a fucking faggot, which he is, we the LGBT Community would be outraged

Faggot Perez should have never ask that question in the first Place. Perez no fucking brains took it upon his own sorry ass to bring the marriage issue in to a place where its wasn't appropriate at all.

Now Perez is nothing but a low life scum ass, he doesn't want her to be Ms America simply because she doesn't support GAYFUCKINGMARRIAGE, which is her right, we need stop force this fucking issue, because we are now provening Maggie of NOM points that we are forcing this down the throats of everyone in America.

SNT: Media Whore Perez Hilton at Miss America

I truly believe that Media Whore Perez play right into NOM Hands at Miss America, The question that he asked had no place there. It only go to show that we are forcing this issue on people, just like NOM has said in their Gathering Storm Ad.

I would like to know who in the fucking hell pick him to a fucking judge in the first place, cause they need to get their f-ing head checked.

I said that Ms California was set up by the host, to get Perez as the judge who would ask her one of the finial question.

I bet Meggie will us that question to fullest in the months to come..

Thanks Perez (fucking loser) Hilton Cel-wanna asshole media whore. I bet he no longer writes at his blog.

Flying Free

Itune Nite

(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)

(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)

Have you noticed, that people are still having sex
All the denouncement had absolutely no effect
Parents and councelors constantly scorn them
but people are still having sex and nothing seems to stop them

(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)

Do you realise, that people are still having sex
they’ve been told not to, perhaps they are perplexed
When you see them holding hands they’re making future plans
to engage in the activity, do you understand me?

People are still having sex, lust keeps on lurking
Nothing makes them stop, this AIDS thing’s not working

People are still having sex, it’s been going on for quite a while
Perhaps it’s quite fashionable, it’s hasn’t got enough style (giggle)

(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)

(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)
(Hello lover)

It’s a fact that people are still having sex
It’s rather obvious, it’s just what one expects
The evidence is all around that everyone in every town
has had it one time or another in their life

At this very moment, people are still having sex
In a downtown condom, or street in the projects
Although you can’t see them, or hear their breathing sounds
someone in this world is having sex right now

People are still having sex!
People are still having sex!
People are still having sex!
People are still having sex!

(Syn Organ solo)

(Sex, sex, sex, sex)
(Sex, sex, sex, sex)(giggle)

(Solo)

People are still having sex, lust keeps on lurking
nothing makes them stop, this AIDS thing’s not working
People are still having sex, it’s been going on for quite a while
Perhaps it’s quite fashionable, it hasn’t got enough style
People are still having sex,
People are still having sex,
People are still having sex,
People are still having sex (sex)

What is the deal using sex to raise money??

Do we need sex to sell our benefits?

Are we a group so shallow that we need sex appeal to raise money? I ask this question for a reason, I understand that Cystic Fibrosis is a painful disease, but do we need a bunch of men in under at a bar in order to raise money for this cause.

Aren’t we saying that we don’t care about this, unless we can get to see a bunch of washboard abs and huge packages.

Just how shallow have we become as a group? That we don't care about a cause unless they use half naked men to get our attention. So lets see regular fund raise = low funds, while using half naked men to almost completely naked men = large funds raised.

I wonder

Just how much is Bush's Debt

Slide Show of the Goldsboro, NC Tea Rally

Wow What a Sign

 

I d on't get this one

 

Is Obama planning to take our guns away???????

Tax Day Teaparty @ Goldsboro, NC

Though I'm a Republican I had to wonder if I was attending a Rally or a Church sermon. I agree with many the politic statement, but not with interjecting GOD into the problems.

They failed to mention the Bush did the First Bailout. That the election in Minnesota was stolen from the Republicans. So much bitching about what the Democrats are doing wrong, that they never mention what the Republicans have done to us.

To make some of the their bullshit points they had to used a child what was his is parents.

yes There some great signs there as well.

I got the info pack, but forgot to get the list of speakers, damn. The info pack was from the John Locke Foundation "Carolina Freedom Club."

I love this little fast fact card there had included. Unemplyment rate for Feb 2009 is 10.7% up from last year of 5.2%, wow what an increase, and wasn't a rep in office in 2008.

Here is one better for you we the people tax rate is higher then Corporate Income tax. Our rate is 7.75% and their (corp) is 6.90%

Here is a list of some of the speakers, (I need to get a voice recorder when I goes to these event, just to much info to remember with out help)

Daren Bakst,
Steve Keen, Wayne County Commissioner

Wait forgot this, while they were doing their protest, A Chopper from channel 11 was over head, one of the speaker claim it was Homeland security, disguise as a news chopper..

TAX DAY TEA PARTY, 2009
GOLDSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Music by Mr. Jimmy Aycock
Song: “The Star Spangled Banner”: Led by …………………………………………..…..Neal Jurney
Welcome and opening remarks:………………………………………………….…………...Linda Harper
Prayer for our Nation ………………………………………………………….…..........Dr. Tom Harper, Sr.
Song: “God Bless America”………………………………………………..............…Dr. Tom Harper, Sr.
Introduction of Senator David Rouzer…………………….. ………..………………. Willie Ray Starling
The Proper Response to “big” government.…………………..……………...Senator David Rouzer
Song: “This Land Is My Land”………………..………..…………………………………..……….Neal Jurney
Introduction of Daren Bakst………………..………………………………………………………...John Skuce
Response to Loss of Freedoms…………………….............Daren Bakst, John Locke Foundation
Song: “Battle Hymn of the Republic”……………….…..………..…………………..…..……Neal Jurney
Response to more taxes……………...Chris Hayes, Senior Legislative Analyst, Civitas Institute
Song: America the Beautiful….……………………………………….………..…….……………..Neal Jurney
Closing remarks……………………….…………………………………………....…Commissioner Steve Keen
My Country Tis Of Thee…and prayer………………….………………………………..…………Neal Jurney

This post is will be updated again soon, with more names

Its bright and clear, after the storm

The Storm is in NC, and I'm afraid

Caption This

What an Idiot, Joel Osteen

What an Idiot, if he truly wants God's best then he need to give up all his money that he is taking from his flock, and live like jesus, and that wife of his' fits every blond joke there is.

"I just don't know where its going"

Its going in your bank accounts and your pocket.

His sermons and writings are sometimes reproached for their use of the concept of the prosperity gospel, a belief that wealth and power are rewards for pious Christians.

Yes the only true God he worship is the color of money,, wealth,, and for the blonde sidekick diamonds and gold rings.. and Hair appointments.

SNT: NOM Responds to HRC Attack!

"HRC's record of truth and honesty about their intentions is not that impressive. They once said marriage amendments weren't necessary because there were no federal court cases. Now there is one."

"They called us liars when we said public schools will teach about gay marriage if its the law--but they do in Massachusetts. Serious religious liberty scholars from Eugene Volokh to Doug Laycock to Robin Wilson acknowledge the central driving idea behind gay marriage--there is no difference between same-sex and opposite sex unions and supporters of marriage are engaging in discrimination if they think differently--will have consequences for the freedoms of traditional faith communities. To pretend otherwise is to be profoundly unserious--if not deceptive--about what gay marriage means."

Maggie Gallagher
President, National Organization for Marriage

Poor Maggie, she just don't get it, does she.

I can only hope that one or both of her children turn out to be gay, that would be poetic justice. Hey Maggie, in today's world Marriage is a contact between two people and the state. If marriage was the a religious institution then we would not need marriage licenses.

I notice that you couldn't even answer the basic question just how will gay marriage affect str8 marriage. Joe kick your ass and shown you for the bigot that you are.

Question Maggie, where you marry when your first child was born, did you get a divorce or was it out of weblock??? If you really wanted to protect marriage then why don't you and your fellow bigots as the states and congress to ban divorce. Like your bigots say ONE MAN ONE WOMAN, TILL DEATH

Something to think about

I did a twitter post where I said that a few members of the First Baptist Church of Rocky Mount, NC were on the dl(down low or in the closet). A friend on twitter sent me the following to me,

if they are on the DL and are openly for NC4Marriage should they be outed? ethics and other considerations to think about..

I agree that they should be outed if they do fully support NC4Marriage group, however if they are just basic members of the church then its not my job. These men have wives and kids which I will not tear about.

One might ask how I know this about them, well in my early days (18-21 years of age)i was really a go getter in the bar and fun scene, (battle park), this park was raid several times in the early 90's which you can find in the achieves of the News and Observer newspapers.

Now like many of the older lgbt community who was once marry to the opposite sex, they grow in a different time, where they had to hide who they truly were. I will not be apart that will destroy a family. Soley because I know once they are outed or if they come out that there is a good chance will be lost the right to a parent to their child. This I know for a fact, my ex-wife knew before we got married, we had one child, when we left each other the local judge in the county that we were living at the time, simply ask her how long she knew, once she told the judge form day 1 the judge told her that she will not consider or listen to any part of my sexuality. that is why she ran tot a state where she could used it against me.

G-A-Y counter Video

Question for the bible beaters

The following passage shows that slaves are clearly property to be bought and sold like livestock.

    However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you.  You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land.  You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance.  You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.  (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

    The following passage describes how the Hebrew slaves are to be treated.

    If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years.  Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom.  If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year.  But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him.  If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master.  But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children.  I would rather not go free.'  If he does this, his master must present him before God.  Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl.  After that, the slave will belong to his master forever.  (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

    Notice how they can get a male Hebrew slave to become a permanent slave by keeping his wife and children hostage until he says he wants to become a permanent slave.  What kind of family values are these?

    The following passage describes the sickening practice of sex slavery.  How can anyone think it is moral to sell your own daughter as a sex slave?

    When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are.  If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again.  But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her.  And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter.  If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife.  If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment.  (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

    So these are the Bible family values!  A man can buy as many sex slaves as he wants as long as he feeds them, clothes them, and screws them!

NC4Marriage Bigots

NC4Marriage Bigots are up in arm over the Vermont Leislature that over ride the Veto of Same Sex Marriage.

The legalization of homosexual "marriage" in Iowa and Vermont adds fuel to the fire of the argument that the North Carolina General Assembly needs to pass the Defense of Marriage Act which will allow the voters of North Carolina the right to vote on a Marriage Protection Amendment to our Constitution. Without protection in our State Constitution for the definition of marriage, North Carolina's marriage laws could be subject to the same type of judicial activism or legislative redefinition that has occurred in Iowa and Vermont. It is the people of North Carolina that deserve to make the decision about what relationships the law will recognize as "marriage."

If that wasn't bad enough they even add the following,

Politicians should never impose a system that intentionally deprives a child of a mother and father. The state should do everything necessary to ensure that children aren’t denied their most important birthright: a mom and a dad. North Carolina politicians need to quit playing "chicken" with our State's marriage laws. The time to protect marriage in our Constitution is now!

Well I don't know who or which bigot wrote the blog post, click here to view, I can think who might have, a certain blond headed bigot does come to mind real fast. I hate to inform this sick group of bigots but the state as a program/law that does just what she doesn't want to happen to the kids. It's call DIVORCE, yes in divorce one parent will almost be cut completely out of their child(ren) lives, i know this first hand.(i'm a gay father who was once legally marry to a complete bitch)

What they don't want the people to know that kids of gay parents are less racist and less of a bigot then those raise by str8 parents who teach their kids to hate, yes these kids are taught to hate gays, in most cases as well blacks and any other group that their so-call parents don't like. Tami Fitzgerald, is nothing more then a bigot by her own right. I would have to wonder exactly what type of Lawyer she is, I sure she wouldn't take a case that involve a gay person for any reason.

What ever happen to the separation of Church and State,
you have see this bigot is action,


I hate the tell this jerk Pastor Olden Thornton, that the bible was once use to justify keeping blacks as slaves.

Mommy Duck and her Ducklings

Out's Power Fifty

50. Urvashi Vaid

Glad to she her back in the spotlight
49. Simon Halls and Stephen Huvane/Previously 37th
48. Jim Nelson/Previously 33rd
47. Greg Berlanti/Previously 19th
46. Hilary Rosen
45. Tim Gunn/Previously 28th

wow still going on, can't wait for the new Project Runway
44. Jason Wu

Wow, make a dress and get the new first lady to wear and you are in. NOT

43. Perez Hilton/Previously 16th

WTF, why why why, no f'ing comment here
42. Rosie O'Donnell/Previously 31st

She need to get back in the game, she should redo her talk show. I miss her
41. Nate Berkus/Previously 21st
40. Nancy Sutley
39. Ron Huberman
38. Tom Ford/Previously 25th
37. Adam Moss/Previously 29th
36. Jodie Foster/Previously 13th
35. Wanda Sykes/
34. Nick Denton/Previously 22nd
33. Martha Nelson/Previously 17th
32. Chris Hughes
31. Jeremy Bernard and Rufus Gifford/Previously 32nd
30. Brian Graden/Previously 15th
29. Michael Patrick King
28. Neil Patrick Harris
27. Christine Quinn/Previously 18th
26. Bryan Lourd and Kevin Huvane/Previously 42nd
25. Dustin Lance Black

wow take a documentary make it in a screen movie and voila your a hit
24. Andrew Tobias/Previously 6th
23. Andrew Sullivan/Previously 20th
22. Suze Orman/Previously 24th
21. Anthony Romero/Previously 23rd
20. Peter Thiel/Previously 10th
19. Rich Ross/Previously 14th
18. Scott Rudin/Previously 11th
17. Jann Wenner/Previously 7th
16. Jared Polis/
15. Marc Jacobs/Previously 9th
14. Gus Van Sant/
13. The New York Times Gay Mafia/Previously 12th
12. Fred Hochberg/Previously 26th
11. Tammy Baldwin
10. David Geffen/Previously 4th
9. Joe Solmonese/Previously 8th
8. Barry Diller
7. Bishop Gene Robinson
6. Matt Drudge
5. Tim Gill/Previously 5th
4. Rachel Maddow
3. Anderson Cooper/Previously 3rd
2. Ellen DeGeneres/Previously 1st
1. Barney Frank/Previously 2nd

Just a Thought

When I snap this shot I had to wonder if we as gays and lesbians we every be this free to show this type of affection in public.

Do you ever think we will be this free?