"HRC's record of truth and honesty about their intentions is not that impressive. They once said marriage amendments weren't necessary because there were no federal court cases. Now there is one."
"They called us liars when we said public schools will teach about gay marriage if its the law--but they do in Massachusetts. Serious religious liberty scholars from Eugene Volokh to Doug Laycock to Robin Wilson acknowledge the central driving idea behind gay marriage--there is no difference between same-sex and opposite sex unions and supporters of marriage are engaging in discrimination if they think differently--will have consequences for the freedoms of traditional faith communities. To pretend otherwise is to be profoundly unserious--if not deceptive--about what gay marriage means."
Maggie Gallagher
President, National Organization for Marriage
Poor Maggie, she just don't get it, does she.
I can only hope that one or both of her children turn out to be gay, that would be poetic justice. Hey Maggie, in today's world Marriage is a contact between two people and the state. If marriage was the a religious institution then we would not need marriage licenses.
I notice that you couldn't even answer the basic question just how will gay marriage affect str8 marriage. Joe kick your ass and shown you for the bigot that you are.
Question Maggie, where you marry when your first child was born, did you get a divorce or was it out of weblock??? If you really wanted to protect marriage then why don't you and your fellow bigots as the states and congress to ban divorce. Like your bigots say ONE MAN ONE WOMAN, TILL DEATH
No comments:
Post a Comment