Sunday, January 10, 2010

Britain war of Photography under section 44

read what section 44 is here. more on the problem here, story here, even here is more

What I don't understand is why they acting like everyone with a camera or video camera is a damn terrorist or working for one. Hell even the press is harass under this law, the Queen is trying to use it to stop the paparazzi to stop photographing her fmaily when there are doing un-royal like things in public...

Yet they enact these laws in 2000, not in the 70's or 80's when the IRA was bombing the hell out of them. It would made sense to enact these laws back then, may be then many of the bombs that place around the city would be found before the went off.. They wait till 200 to enact this law, and many others...

They enact this law a year before 9/11, I would have to wonder what did they know and when did they know it.

As we know what ever happens in the queen's land finds it way over here in a few years it has been 10 years since they enact their laws, 9 years since we enacted our PA law,,, Harassment against photographer have started in both countries,, So I guess we have come full circle here... Yes it does happen here, for years now some of our officials have try to get CCTV in New York and other cities, they have not fully got them here yet,, Across the pond in 2006 There are up to 4.2m CCTV cameras in Britain - about one for every 14 people, could you imagine how many there will/or could be in the US if congress every pass a bill to have them here... I'm sure it will be the ten or if not hundreds of millions

No comments:

Post a Comment

Children should't be subject to life long medical choices

Very interesting statement, which I'm sure the #transinc community will claim to be Transphobic.. in natural. There is nothing bias ...