Take the class below
Wis. teen will need legal permission to date girl
The Associated Press
Friday, December 18, 2009
APPLETON, Wis. — A Wisconsin teenager will need legal permission to date girls for the next three years after he was convicted of fleeing to Tennessee with his girlfriend in a stolen car.
Nineteen-year-old Jordan S. Christensen of Appleton was sentenced Friday to one year in jail and three years' probation. Outagamie County Judge John Des Jardins has ordered "no dating of the opposite sex without permission of your probation agent."
Christensen had pleaded no contest to charges of auto theft, stealing a firearm and bail jumping. He apologized for his actions before the sentencing.
Investigators say Christensen stole his foster parents' car May 26 and fled to the Memphis area with his 16-year-old girlfriend.
___
Information from: The Post-Crescent, http://www.postcrescent.com
Now if this judge order that a woman would need permission to date while on probation, every women groups across the land would be calling for his dismissal from the bench asap.
another point is why are men circumcise and women are not, now see its ok to cut off men extra skin (foreskin) but not for women, in those counties where female circumcision does happen, women in every other country call it wrong, yet these same women will allow this do be done to their sons, This is one reason why its ok to do this to men
If it for entrance to manhood then tell me why don't we let these young men decide if they want to have their manhood mutilated.. Well its not working for suppressing of sexual pleasure. Hygiene please, i'm sure there could be better reason then that.
It has been variously proposed that circumcision began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility, as a means of suppressing sexual pleasure or to increase a man's attractiveness to women, or as an aid to hygiene where regular bathing was impractical, among other possibilities. Immerman et al. suggest that circumcision causes lowered sexual arousal of pubescent males, and hypothesize that this was a competitive advantage to tribes practicing circumcision, leading to its spread regardless of whether the people understood this.
Yet when it is done to a women it call the following, Female genital mutilation. Yet its ok to mutilate a male not a female. So ask your self who is truly a second class citizen. Here is the reason why this is a no no for female circumcision, Opposition is motivated by concerns regarding the consent (or lack thereof, in most cases) of the patient. and subsequently the safety and long-term consequences of the procedures. In the past several decades, there have been many concentrated efforts by the World Health Organization (WHO) to end the practice of FGC. The United Nations has also declared February 6 as "International Day Against Female Genital Mutilation". It's ok to mutilation boys a few day after birth or 8 days.. as long it make $$$$ for the doctors....
I'm sorry but I don't think every male child who was circumcise as a baby gave consent to have this done. So what sex is given more protection then the other, answer that question and you will see who are the second class citizens in this country
No comments:
Post a Comment